General
Scarborough v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.
326 U.S. 755·Supreme Court of the United States·1945
Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas, and Mr. Justice Murphy are of the opinion that petition for certiorari should be granted because of conflict with Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 318 U. S. 54. Mr. John H. Hoffman for petitioner.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 355.
Scarborough v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.
October 15, 1945.
Mr. R. Aubrey Bogley for respondent.
Messrs. Lee Pressman and Frank Donner filed a brief on behalf of the United Railroad Workers of America, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas, and Mr. Justice Murphy are of the opinion that petition for certiorari should be granted because of conflict with Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 318 U. S. 54. Mr. John H. Hoffman for petitioner.