Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
RIPLEY v. UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES v. RIPLEY, 1912 — 223 U.S. 750 · caselaw · US
General
RIPLEY v. UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES v. RIPLEY
223 U.S. 750·Supreme Court of the United States·1912
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
RIPLEY v. UNITED STATES. UNITED STATES v. RIPLEY.
Nos. 498, 499.
Motion to modify judgment, submitted March 18, 1912.
Decided April 1, 1912.
Mr. William, H. Robeson, Mr. Benjamin Carter and Mr. F. Carter Pope for Ripley.
Mr. Assistant Attorney General John Q. Thompson and Mr. Philip M. Ashford,for the United States.
For opinion of the court in this case see ante, p. 701.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
April 1, 1912.
Per Curiam:
motion to modify judgment denied.