General
Hindy Eshel et al., Appellants, v. Fleet Bank et al., Defendants, and Sterling National Bank, Respondent
279 A.D.2d 281718 N.Y.S.2d 825·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2001·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Hindy Eshel et al., Appellants, v Fleet Bank et al., Defendants, and Sterling National Bank, Respondent.
[718 NYS2d 825]
[MAJORITY]
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Ramos, J.), entered on or about July 25, 2000, which, in an action for fraud and misappropriation of investment monies, granted defendant-respondent’s motion to disqualify plaintiffs’ attorneys, unanimously affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in Bassman v Blackstone Assocs. (279 AD2d 280 [decided herewith]). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Andrias, Ellerin and Lerner, JJ.