Contracts · MBE-tested
Howard v. United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio et al.
562 U.S. 1284·Supreme Court of the United States·2011
Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 10-8576.
Howard v. United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio et al.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. D. C. Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 89.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.