Contracts · MBE-tested
Nukk et al. v. Shaughnessy, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service
350 U.S. 869100 L. Ed. 2d 769·Supreme Court of the United States·1955
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 29.
Nukk et al. v. Shaughnessy, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service.
Gloria Agrin and Blanch Freedman argued the cause and filed a brief for appellants. Gray Thoron argued the cause for appellee. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg, J. F. Bishop and L. Paul Winings.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Argued October 19, 1955. Decided October 24, 1955.
Per Curiam:
The Court is of opinion that the complaints do present a case and controversy. Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United States, 307 U. S. 125. The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded for consideration on the merits.