Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
MARYLAND CASUALTY CO., Appellant, v. CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 10 OF PEMISCOT COUNTY, MISSOURI, et al., 1934 — 73 F.2d 1005 · caselaw · US
General
MARYLAND CASUALTY CO., Appellant, v. CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 10 OF PEMISCOT COUNTY, MISSOURI, et al.
73 F.2d 1005·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
MARYLAND CASUALTY CO., Appellant, v. CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 10 OF PEMISCOT COUNTY, MISSOURI, et al.
No. 10057.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
July 21, 1934.
William H. Allen, W. Edwin Moser, John S. Marsalek, and Julian C. Jaeekcl, all of St. Louis, Mo., for appellant.
Seneca C. Taylor and llezekiah Sanders, both of St. Louis, Mo., and Ward & Reeves, of Caruthersville, Mo., for appellee.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Appeal docketed and dismissed, at costs of appellant, on motion of appellant and certificate of clerk of United States District Court under Rule 16.