Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Schenectady Union Publishing Co. v. Sweeney, 1942 — 316 U.S. 642 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Schenectady Union Publishing Co. v. Sweeney
316 U.S. 64286 L. Ed. 1727·Supreme Court of the United States·1942
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 745.
Schenectady Union Publishing Co. v. Sweeney.
Argued March 31, April 1,1942.
Decided April 13, 1942.
Mr. Morris L. Ernst, with whom Messrs. William A. Roberts, Benjamin Kaplan, and Edgar Turlington were on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. John O’Connor, with whom Mr. William F. Cusick was on the brief, for respondent. Briefs of amici curiae were filed by Mr. Edmund D. Campbell on behalf of the American Civil Liberties Union; by Messrs. Milton Handler, Henry H. Nordlinger, and David Sher on behalf of the American Jewish Committee et al.; and by Mr. Charles J. Tobin on behalf of the New York State Publishers Assn.,—urging reversal.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Certiorari, 314 U. S. 605, to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Per Curiam:
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court. Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.