Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
SPENKELINK v. WAINWRIGHT et al., 1979 — 442 U.S. 1308 · caselaw · US
General
SPENKELINK v. WAINWRIGHT et al.
442 U.S. 1308·Supreme Court of the United States·1979
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
SPENKELINK v. WAINWRIGHT et al.
No. A-1016.
Decided May 23, 1979
[MAJORITY — Mr. Justice Marshall.]
Mr. Justice Marshall.
John A. Spenkelink, who is scheduled to be put to death at 7:00 a. m. on May 23, 1979, has applied to me for a stay of his execution. Mr. Justice Rehnquist and Mr. Justice Stevens have both denied the application, and the pertinent facts are set forth in Mr. Justice Rehnquist’s opinion, ante, p. 1301. Given the Court of Appeals’ divided vote on whether to grant a certificate of probable cause, the irrevocable nature of the penalty to be imposed, and the ability of the full Court to consider this case within 36 hours at our regular Conference, I believe it appropriate to grant the application for a stay until further action by the entire Court.
Granted.