Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Erlenbaugh et al. v. United States, 1972 — 405 U.S. 973 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Erlenbaugh et al. v. United States
405 U.S. 973·Supreme Court of the United States·1972
Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 71-839.
Erlenbaugh et al. v. United States.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari granted limited to Question 1, presented by the petition, which reads as follows:
“1. Whether the Court of Appeals erred in not following the opinion of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in a 1967 case entitled U. S. vs Arnold, 380 Federal 2nd, 366, thus creating a conflict between the circuits.”
Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.