General
SAMUEL NEWMAN v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN FRANCISCO
62 Cal. 545·Supreme Court of California·1881·CA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
[No. 7,668.
Department One.]
June 15, 1881.
SAMUEL NEWMAN v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN FRANCISCO.
Certiorari—Appeal.—When an appeal may be taken a party is not entitled to a writ of certiorari.
Application for writ of certiora/ri to the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco.
E. B. Brahe, for Plaintiff.
G. E. Boyce, for Defendant.
[MAJORITY — The Court :]
The Court :
The order of the Superior Court of San Francisco, which the petitioner asks to have reviewed upon a writ of certiorari, is a special .order, made after final judgment, in the case of Mohle v. Tschirtch, from which an appeal is allowed by Subd. 3, Section 939, C. C. P. When an appeal may be taken, a party is not entitled to a writ of certiorari.
Application for writ denied.