Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
J. V. CHAMPION and J. H. Le Roy, Sr., Receivers of Eastern Cotton Oil Company, Appellants, v. R. E. WHITEHURST and W. B. R. Guion, Attorneys for D. L. Ward and E. H. Meadows, Receivers, Appellees; In Cause of Davison Chemical Co. v. Eastern Cotton Oil Co., 1934 — 73 F.2d 994 · caselaw · US
General
J. V. CHAMPION and J. H. Le Roy, Sr., Receivers of Eastern Cotton Oil Company, Appellants, v. R. E. WHITEHURST and W. B. R. Guion, Attorneys for D. L. Ward and E. H. Meadows, Receivers, Appellees; In Cause of Davison Chemical Co. v. Eastern Cotton Oil Co.
73 F.2d 994·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
J. V. CHAMPION and J. H. Le Roy, Sr., Receivers of Eastern Cotton Oil Company, Appellants, v. R. E. WHITEHURST and W. B. R. Guion, Attorneys for D. L. Ward and E. H. Meadows, Receivers, Appellees, In Cause of Davison Chemical Co. v. Eastern Cotton Oil Co.
No. 3729.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Oct. 18, 1934.
Kenneth C. Royall, of Goldsboro, N. C., and Larry I. Moore, of New Bern, N. C., for appellants.
W. B. R. Guión and R. E. Whitehurst, both of New Bern, N. C., for appellees.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Appeal dismissed, with costs, as having been prematurely taken. Decree filed.