Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
St. Clair County v. Lovingston, 1873 — 85 U.S. 628 · caselaw · US
General
St. Clair County v. Lovingston
85 U.S. 62818 Wall. 628·Supreme Court of the United States·1873
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
St. Clair County v. Lovingston.
No judgment is final which does not terminate the litigation between the parties. A judgment reversing the judgment of an inferior court, and remanding the cause for such other and further proceedings as to law and justice shall appertain, does not do this. A writ of error to such a judgment dismissed, on the authority of Moore v. Robbins, supra, p. 588.
Error to-the Supreme Court of Illinois.
The county of St. Clair, in Illinois, sued Lovingston in the Circuit Court of the county, and got judgment against him. The Supreme Court of 'Illinois reversed this judgment, and remanded the cause “ for such other and further proceedings as to law and justice shall appertain.” To that judgment the county took this writ of error.
Mr. G. Koerner, for the plaintiff in error; Mr. W. II. Underwood, contra
[MAJORITY — Mr. Justice STRONG]
Mr. Justice STRONG
delivered the opinion of the court.
The writ of error in this case must be dismissed on the authority of Moore v. Robbins, decided at this term. The judgment of the Supreme Court of the State cannot be regarded as a final judgment in the sense in-which the term was used in the Judiciary Acts. No judgment is final which does not terminate .the litigation between the parties to the suit. The issue between the parties may be again tried in the Circuit Court, and another judgment may be recovered, which may be removed to the Supreme Court for revision. Consequently, then, there has been no final determination of the case.
Writ dismissed.