Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. L. E. Goodrich, 1913 — 229 U.S. 607 · caselaw · US
General
Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. L. E. Goodrich
229 U.S. 607·Supreme Court of the United States·1913
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1035.
Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. L. E. Goodrich.
In error to thé Court of Civil Appeals for the Fifth Supreme Judicial District of the State of Texas.
Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted April 21, 1913.
Decided May 5, 1913.
Mr. Jos. M. Bryson, Mr. Alex. S. Coke, and Mr. Aldis B. Browne for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. J. A. L. Wolfe for the defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction, upon the authority of York v. Texas, 137 U. S. 15; Kauffman v. Wootters, 138 U. S. 285.