Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Chewning v. Smyth, Penitentiary Superintendent, 1961 — 365 U.S. 832 · caselaw · US
General
Chewning v. Smyth, Penitentiary Superintendent
365 U.S. 832·Supreme Court of the United States·1961
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 276,
Misc.
Chewning v. Smyth, Penitentiary Superintendent.
Petitioner pro se.
Reno S. Harp III, Assistant Attorney General of Virginia, for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Motion to substitute W. K. Cunningham, Jr. in place of W. Frank Smyth, Jr. as the party respondent granted. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia granted. Case transferred to the appellate docket.