General

George Cisler, Respondent, v. Peyton S. Kirk, Appellant

244 A.D. 732·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1935·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

George Cisler, Respondent, v. Peyton S. Kirk, Appellant. [MAJORITY] Action to recover damages for personal injuries and property damage resulting from the collision of two automobiles. Judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of seventy-five dollars for property damage, reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. This case was tried together with the case of Kirk v. Cisler, decided herewith [post, p. 733], The prejudicial error necessitating a reversal in that case applies equally to this case. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Seudder and Johnston, JJ., concur.