Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a Corporation, Claimant, etc., Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, 1932 — 58 F.2d 1082 · caselaw · US
Corporations
GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a Corporation, Claimant, etc., Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
58 F.2d 1082·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a Corporation, Claimant, etc., Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 6584.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
June 7, 1932.
See decision of the Supreme Court of the United States answering questions certified 52 S. Ct. 468, 76 L. Ed.-.
Potter & Getz, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
Samuel W. MeNabb, U. S. Atty., of Los Angeles, Cal.
Before WILBUR and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges, and NORCRQSS, • District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States answering certain questions certified to it by this court in this eause having been ordered filed, it is ordered that decrees of affirmance be filed and entered in this ease; mandates forthwith.