Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Clarence L. Barber, as Assignee of Horace M. Hooker, et al., Appellants, v. Curtis A. Barnum, Respondent, 1907 — 189 N.Y. 506 · caselaw · US
General
Clarence L. Barber, as Assignee of Horace M. Hooker, et al., Appellants, v. Curtis A. Barnum, Respondent
189 N.Y. 506·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Clarence L. Barber, as Assignee of Horace M. Hooker, et al., Appellants, v. Curtis A. Barnum, Respondent.
Barber v. Barnum, 117 App. Div. 325, appeal dismissed.
(Argued May 23, 1907;
decided June 11, 1907.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered March 20, 1907, which reversed an order of Special Term granting a motion to renew a prior motion for leave to sell defendant’s interest in certain property and granting permission for such sale.
Cla/rence L. Barber for appellants.
Carlton B. Pierce for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, without costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Yann, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.