Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Application of The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, Appellant, Relative to Acquiring Title to East One Hundred and Sixty-eighth Street; James A. Deering et al., Respondents, 1898 — 156 N.Y. 677 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Application of The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, Appellant, Relative to Acquiring Title to East One Hundred and Sixty-eighth Street; James A. Deering et al., Respondents
156 N.Y. 677·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, Appellant, Relative to Acquiring Title to East One Hundred and Sixty-eighth Street; James A. Deering et al., Respondents.
Matter of the Mayor, 28 App. Div. 143, appeal dismissed.
(Argued June 7, 1898;
decided June 7, 1898.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 13, 1898, affirming an order of Special Term directing commissioners of estimate and assessment, appointed in the above-entitled proceeding, to determine the compensation which should be made to the respondents for the damage caused them by the closing of a part of Gerard avenue.
Theodore Connoly and John P. Dunn for appellant.
James A. Deering, respondent, in person.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed on argument, with costs.