General
Thomas WRIGHT, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error
295 F. 1023·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1923
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Thomas WRIGHT, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
December 18, 1923.
Rehearing Denied February 13, 1924.)
No. 4128.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana; Rufus E. Foster, Judge.
Arthur B. Leopold, of New Orleans, La. (Arthur B. Leopold and Henry L, Landfried, both of New Orleans,' La., on the brief), for plaintiff in error. L. P. Bryant, Jr., and Rene J. Waguespack, Asst. U. S. Attys., both of New Orleans, La. (Louis H.'Burns, U. S. Atty., and Rene J. Waguespack, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of New Orleans, La., on the brief), for the United States.
Before WALKER and BRYAN, Circuit Judges, and GRUBB, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The judgment in this case is affirmed.