General
National Labor Relations Board v. Bata Shoe Co., Inc., et al.
389 U.S. 917·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 456.
National Labor Relations Board v. Bata Shoe Co., Inc., et al.
Solicitor General Marshall, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for petitioner.
Madeline Balk and Frederick T. Gray for Bata Shoe Co., Inc., and Joseph L. Rauh, Jr., and John Silard for United Shoe Workers of America, AFL-CIO, respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.