Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Frey versus Leeper, 1791 — 2 U.S. 131 · caselaw · US
Securities
Frey versus Leeper
2 U.S. 1312 Dall. 131·Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·1791·PA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frey versus Leeper.
THE determination of this cause turned on the following point, which was submitted to the Court, to wit; whether goods, which, after being distrained for rent, had been replevied, and delivered to the plaintiff in replevin, could be taken in execution.
Decided at Cumberland, Nisi Prius, before Shippen and Bradford, Justices, in October, 1791.
[MAJORITY — By the Court :]
By the Court :
—This point has been already determined in Philadelphia. The lien on the goods is discharged by the security given to the sheriff; and as soon as they are delivered back to the plaintiff in replevin, they are open; to execution, or a new distress.
Judgment for the Plaintiff.