Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Indiana Department of State Revenue, Gross Income Tax Division, v. Nebeker, 1955 — 348 U.S. 933 · caselaw · US
Tax
Indiana Department of State Revenue, Gross Income Tax Division, v. Nebeker
348 U.S. 93399 L. Ed. 2d 731·Supreme Court of the United States·1955
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas dissent.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 55.
Indiana Department of State Revenue, Gross Income Tax Division, v. Nebeker.
Argued February 1, 1955.
Decided February 7, 1955.
Lloyd C. Hutchinson, Deputy Attorney General of Indiana, argued the cause for petitioner.
With him on the brief were Edwin K. Steers, Attorney General, and Carl M. Franceschini, Deputy Attorney General.
Raymond O. Evans argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Certiorari, 348 U. S. 808, to the Supreme Court of Indiana.
Per Curiam:
Affirmed on the authority of Freeman v. Hewit, 329 U. S. 249.
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas dissent.