Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States v. National Steel Corp. et al., 1967 — 386 U.S. 939 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
United States v. National Steel Corp. et al.
386 U.S. 939·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
February 27, 1967.
No. 31.
United States v. National Steel Corp. et al.
Solicitor General Marshall for the United States, and Denman,Moody and C. Brien Dillon for National Steel Corp. et al., and B. J. Bradshaw for Brown et al., on the motion.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from D. C. S. D. Tex. (Probable jurisdiction noted, 383 U. S. 905.) Joint motion to refer this case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas granted and case referred to that court for consideration of the .settlement agreement.