General
Elliott C. Cowdin et al., Respondents, v. Alfred Teal, Appellant
67 N.Y. 581·New York Court of Appeals·1876·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Elliott C. Cowdin et al., Respondents, v. Alfred Teal, Appellant.
Upon appeal to this court from an order under subdivision 4 of section 11 of the Code, an undertaking is necessary.
(Argued June 20, 1876;
decided September 19, 1876.)
This was a motion to dismiss, for want of an undertaking, an appeal from an order of General Term affirming an order of Special Term referring this action. Held, as above.
J. D. Taylor for the motion.
H. A. Soutfmorih opposed.
[MAJORITY — Per Owriam mem.]
Per Owriam mem.
for granting motion.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.