Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Lizzie Ellen Wiggins, Appellant, 1883 — 92 N.Y. 656 · caselaw · US
Criminal Law · MBE-tested
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Lizzie Ellen Wiggins, Appellant
92 N.Y. 656·New York Court of Appeals·1883·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Lizzie Ellen Wiggins, Appellant.
(Argued May 1, 1883;
decided May 11, 1883.)
Mem. of decision below (28 Hun, 308).
' The defendant was indicted and convicted of grand larceny in stealing a pocket-book containing money from one Mrs. Curtis, who was not produced as a witness on the trial. Because of this, it was objected that the prisoner could not be convicted. The court here say:
“It was not necessary to call Mrs. Curtis as a witness. There was sufficient evidence that she was the person in Macy’s store; that, she owned the pocket-book, and that the defendant took it from her, against her will and without her consent, and for the purpose of stealing it.”
Benjamin Steinhardt for appellant.
A. J. Requier for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Earl, J.,]
Earl, J.,
reads mem. for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.