Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Edward F. Linton, Appellant, v. The Long Island Railroad Company, Respondent, 1906 — 183 N.Y. 559 · caselaw · US
General
Edward F. Linton, Appellant, v. The Long Island Railroad Company, Respondent
183 N.Y. 559·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Edward F. Linton, Appellant, v. The Long Island Railroad Company, Respondent.
(Argued December 12, 1905;
decided January 9, 1906.)
Linton v. Long Island R. R. Co , 91 App. Div. 515, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second-judicial department, entered March 12, 1904, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term.
R. Percy Chittenden for appellant.
George W. Wingate and Joseph F. Keany for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that under the statute the plaintiff’s claim is against the fund provided by the municipality and not against the defendant.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Vann and Werner, JJ.