General
Robert Deshefy, Respondent, v. E. de C. Chisholm, Edwin N. Chapman and Others, Copartners, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Chisholm & Chapman, Appellants
239 A.D. 792·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1933·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Robert Deshefy, Respondent, v. E. de C. Chisholm, Edwin N. Chapman and Others, Copartners, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Chisholm & Chapman, Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ.