Contracts · MBE-tested
Shushan v. United States; Newman et al. v. United States; Miller v. United States; and Waguespack v. United States
313 U.S. 574·Supreme Court of the United States·1941
Me. Justice Muephy took no part in the consideration and decision of these applications.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 910.
No. 911.
No. 912.
No. 913.
Shushan v. United States; Newman et al. v. United States; Miller v. United States; and Waguespack v. United States.
May 12, 1941.
Mr. Hugh M. Wilkinson for petitioner in No. 910. Messrs. Morris L. Ernst, James J. Magner, Drnid V. Cahill, Isaac 8. Heller, Theodore 8. Jaffin, and Benjamin Kaplan for petitioners in No. 911. Messrs. Warren O. Coleman and Edward R. Schowalter for petitioner in No. 912. Mr. W. J. Waguespack, Jr. for petitioner in No. 913. Assistant Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Berge, and Messrs. Oscar A. Provost, Harold Rosenwald, and Fred E. Strine for the United States.
[MAJORITY]
The motion for leave to file a supplemental petition in No. 911 is granted. The petitions for writs of cer-tiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit are denied.
Me. Justice Muephy took no part in the consideration and decision of these applications.
Reported below: 117 F. 2d 110.