General
Curtiss Gardens, Inc., Respondent, Appellant, v. David Kaufman and James Fyfe, Appellants, Respondents, and Dade Bros. Manufacturing Co., Inc., and Others, Defendants
224 A.D. 849·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1928·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Curtiss Gardens, Inc., Respondent, Appellant, v. David Kaufman and James Fyfe, Appellants, Respondents, and Dade Bros. Manufacturing Co., Inc., and Others, Defendants.
[MAJORITY]
Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ.