Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Alleghany Corporation et al. v. Breswick & Co. et al., 1956 — 351 U.S. 903 · caselaw · US
Corporations
Alleghany Corporation et al. v. Breswick & Co. et al.
351 U.S. 903·Supreme Court of the United States·1956
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 692.
Alleghany Corporation et al. v. Breswick & Co. et al.
David Hart field, Jr., Edward K. Wheeler, Orison S. M arden, William L. Williams and Robert G. Beaks for the Alle-ghany Corporation, Harold H. Levin for Gruss et al., and Alexander Kahan for Neuwirth et al., appellants. George Brussel, Jr. for Breswick & Co. et al., appellees.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Probable jurisdiction noted. The motions of Adelaide Neuwirth and Joseph S. Gruss et al. for leave to join in the jurisdictional statement of the Alleghany Corporation are granted. The motions to advance are denied.