General
Daniel E. Pomeroy and Others, Respondents, v. The Hocking Valley Railway Company, Appellant
173 A.D. 927·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1916·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Daniel E. Pomeroy and Others, Respondents, v. The Hocking Valley Railway Company, Appellant.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 33d day of February, 1916, denying a motion to vacate the service of the summons and complaint.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
Within the rule laid down in Washington Virginia R. Co. v. Real Estate Trust Co. (388 U. S. 185), this company was doing business within the State of New York for the purpose of service within that State. The order should, therefore, be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Page and Davis, JJ. Clarke, P. J., and Davis, J., dissented, on the authority of Bagdon v. Philadelphia & Beading Coal & Iron Co. (317 N. Y. 433). Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.