Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Charles C. Motel, an Infant, by Guardian, etc., Respondent, v. The Sixth Avenue Railroad Company, Appellant, 1885 — 99 N.Y. 632 · caselaw · US
General
Charles C. Motel, an Infant, by Guardian, etc., Respondent, v. The Sixth Avenue Railroad Company, Appellant
99 N.Y. 632·New York Court of Appeals·1885·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles C. Motel, an Infant, by Guardian, etc., Respondent, v. The Sixth Avenue Railroad Company, Appellant.
(Argued March 27, 1885;
decided April 28, 1885.)
D. M. Porter for appellant.
Osborn E. Bright for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to reverse judgment, and for a new trial on opinion of Judge Beach in the court below.
All concur, except Banforth, J., dissenting.
Judgment reversed.