Torts · MBE-tested
De Grau v. Wilson
22 F. 560·United States Circuit Court for the Eastern District of New York·1884
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
De Grau v. Wilson.
(Circuit Court, E. D. New York.
June 23, 1884.)
Bill oe Lading-^Oommon Carrier — Warehouseman—Destruction oe Goods by Fire — Burden oe Proof — Negligence.
The decree of the district court in the same case (17 Fed. Rep. 698) affirmed.
See the opinion of the district court in the same case, (Be Grau v. Wilson,) 17 Fed. Rep. 698. — [Rep.
In Admiralty. ,
B. P. Lee, for libelants and appellants.
Foster & Thomson, for respondents and appellees.
[MAJORITY — Blatcheord, Justice.]
Blatcheord, Justice.
The conclusions of fact and of law arrived at by the district judge in his decision seem to be warranted by the evidence. He had the advantage of seeing the witnesses and hearing their testimony. The case is one depending largely on the credibility of witnesses and the> ascertainment of facts. The additional proofs taken in this court do not vary the case. There must be a decree dismissing the libel, with costs to the respondents in the district court, taxed at $114.43, and in this court to be taxed.