Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Jackson et al., Executors, v. Vanhorn, 1788 — 1 U.S. 241 · caselaw · US
General
Jackson et al., Executors, v. Vanhorn
1 U.S. 2411 Dall. 241·Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas·1788·PA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Jackson et al., Executors, v. Vanhorn.
Opening default.
Judgment opened, where defendant, by mistake of the attorney, had notice of trial on a wrong day.
Judgment had been entered by non sum informatus, in this cause, as the defendant did not appear on the day of trial. But Sergeant now moved to open the judgment, upon an affidavit that the defendant had' notice of tha trial for the 17th, instead of the 13th, and that there was a just and con-scionahle defence.
Lewis, for the plaintiff,
said, that he did not mean to contest the matter, but he wished it to be settled, whether the mistake of an attorney was, in such cases, sufficient to set aside a judgment.
[MAJORITY — By the Court.]
By the Court.
On a mistake of this kind, evidently appearing, we cannot refuse the motion.