General
Agnes Zoliewski, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant
140 N.Y. 621·New York Court of Appeals·1893·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Agnes Zoliewski, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.
(Argued October 20, 1893;
decided November 28, 1893.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Superior Court of the city of New York, entered upon an order made February 3, 1893, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Charles A. Pooley for appellant.
William Armstrong and Edward T. Pwra/nt for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm, with costs and ten per cent damages for delay under section 3251 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.