Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Isaac J. Drake, Appellant, v. The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, Respondent, 1879 — 77 N.Y. 611 · caselaw · US
General
Isaac J. Drake, Appellant, v. The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, Respondent
77 N.Y. 611·New York Court of Appeals·1879·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Isaac J. Drake, Appellant, v. The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, Respondent.
(Argued April 11, 1879 ;
decided April 25, 1879.)
Plaintiff, in 1870, was appointed a police court clerk by one of the police justices of the city of New York. The board of supervisors, upon being notified, passed a resolution fixing his salary “ at the same amount now allowed to police court clerks.” Prior to December 31, 1864, the salary of the police court clerks had been $1,458 per annum, by resolution passed on that day it was increased to the sum of $2,500 per annum ; by virtue of section 26, chap. 508, Laws of 1860, a resolution was passed by the common council December 31, 1869, fixing such salary at $4,000 per annum.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover the difference between the salary as fixed in 1864, and that fixed in 1869.
Defendant, among other things, pleaded in bar, and proved on the trial a former action brought by the plaintiff to recover his salary from September 1, 1871 to August 1, 1872, wherein it ivas held, that he was entitled to recover at the rate of $2,500 per annum, and judgment was rendered at that rate. (Reported, Drake v. The Mayor, 7 Lans., 340.) Held, that the plea was good and that the question was res adjudícala.
James H. Graybill for appellant.
D. J. Dean for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Miller, J.,]
Miller, J.,
read for affirmance.
All concur, except Daneorth, J., not voting.
Judgment affirmed.