General
In the Matter of the Application of Hugo Seidenberg and Rose Seidenberg, Appellants, for a Mandamus Order against Edward P. Burwell, Superintendent of Buildings of the Borough of Queens, City of New York, Respondent
234 A.D. 780·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1931·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of Hugo Seidenberg and Rose Seidenberg, Appellants, for a Mandamus Order against Edward P. Burwell, Superintendent of Buildings of the Borough of Queens, City of New York, Respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Motion to dismiss appeal denied upon condition that appellants perfect the appeal for the January, 1932, term (for which term the case is set down) and be ready for argument when reached; otherwise, motion granted, -with ten dollars costs. Present—-Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Tompkins, JJ.