Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Courtney et al. v. Schroeder, 1955 — 348 U.S. 933 · caselaw · US
General
Courtney et al. v. Schroeder
348 U.S. 93399 L. Ed. 2d 732·Supreme Court of the United States·1955
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 179.
Courtney et al. v. Schroeder.
Argued February 4, 1955.
Decided February 7, 1955.
Payne H. Ratner argued the cause for petitioners.
With him on the brief was Keith Eales.
Dale M. Stucky argued the cause for respondent.
With him on the brief were Harold R. Fatzer, Attorney General of Kansas, and Warner Moore.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Certiorari, 348 U. S. 854, to the Supreme Court of Kansas.
Per Curiam:
The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded for proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this Court in In re Oliver, 333 U. S. 257.