Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
RAY'S CREDIT CLOTHING CO., Inc., Petitioner, v. Sidney L. BAUMAN, Respondent, 1926 — 17 F.2d 1018 · caselaw · US
General
RAY'S CREDIT CLOTHING CO., Inc., Petitioner, v. Sidney L. BAUMAN, Respondent
17 F.2d 1018·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1926
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
RAY’S CREDIT CLOTHING CO., Inc., Petitioner, v. Sidney L. BAUMAN, Respondent.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
December 20, 1926.)
No. 302, Original.
Petition to Revise Order of the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri.
Louis Mayer and Irl B. Rosenblum, both of St. Louis, Mo., for petitioner.
Irvin V. Barth, of St. Louis, Mo., for respondent.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Petition to revise dismissed, without costs to either party in this ■court, per stipulation of parties.