Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John F. MAEDER et al., Appellants, v. JOHN R. THOMPSON CO., Appellee, 1926 — 12 F.2d 1016 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
John F. MAEDER et al., Appellants, v. JOHN R. THOMPSON CO., Appellee
12 F.2d 1016·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1926
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John F. MAEDER et al., Appellants, v. JOHN R. THOMPSON CO., Appellee.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
May 25, 1926.)
No. 3424.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania.
John M. Henry, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellants.
Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
After argument and due consideration had, the motion to dismiss is granted.