Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
ROYAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, Appellant, v. R. S. SPROUL, Trustee of the Estate of Morris Samuel PERELSTINE, Trading as Carter Shoe Company, Bankrupt, Appellee, 1931 — 46 F.2d 1019 · caselaw · US
Bankruptcy
ROYAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, Appellant, v. R. S. SPROUL, Trustee of the Estate of Morris Samuel PERELSTINE, Trading as Carter Shoe Company, Bankrupt, Appellee
46 F.2d 1019·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1931
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
ROYAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, Appellant, v. R. S. SPROUL, Trustee of the Estate of Morris Samuel PERELSTINE, Trading as Carter Shoe Company, Bankrupt, Appellee.
No. 4476.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Feb. 6, 1931.
See, also, 15 F.(2d) 64; 19 F.(2d) 408.
Frank K. Willmann, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellant.
Sidney J. Watts and Lewis M. Alpem, both of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellee.
Before BUFFINGTON and WOOLLEY, Circuit Judges, and THOMPSON, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The order of the District Court [44 F. (2d) 62] is affirmed on Judge Schoonmaker’s opinion.