Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Calvert v. Pitt, 1789 — 1 U.S. 406 · caselaw · US
Securities
Calvert v. Pitt
1 U.S. 4061 Dall. 406·Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·1789·PA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Calvert v. Pitt.
Justice of the Peace. — Practice.
This was a certiorari to one of the justices of Chester county. On arguing the case, the judgment of the justice was affirmed.
[MAJORITY]
And, by McKean, Chief 'Justice, it was stated, that conformable to the act of assembly, the defendant, after judgment was given against him by a justice, ought to enter into a recognisance instanter, with, at least, one good surety. He may afterwards withdraw his security, or appeal to the common pleas, within the six days allowed by the act.
Contra, Mann v. Alberti, 2 Binn. 195, under the act of 1804.