General
Ralph E. SUNDERLAND, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error; Willard V. MATTHEWS, Plaintiff in Error, v. SAME, Defendant in Error; Thomas H. MATTERS, Plaintiff in Error, v. SAME, Defendant in Error
294 F. 811·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1923
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Ralph E. SUNDERLAND, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error. Willard V. MATTHEWS, Plaintiff in Error, v. SAME, Defendant in Error. Thomas H. MATTERS, Plaintiff in Error, v. SAME, Defendant in Error.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
December 10, 1923.)
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The plaintiffs in error in the cases above entitled, who were codefendants below with the plaintiff in error in Stickel v. United States 294 Fed. 808, made applications on like facts for like orders for an extension of time to prepare, serve, and settle the bill of exceptions and for an enlargement of the time to file the record to those sought in Stickel v. United States. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, let orders of the same character as those there directed be made in these cases.'