General
GRIGSBY v. MILLER et al.
245 F. 985·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1917
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
GRIGSBY v. MILLER et al.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
November 19, 1917.)
No. 3083.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Oregon.
Almon E. Roth, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellees.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon motion of counsel for appellees, and good cause therefor appearing, ordered, appeal dismissed for the noncompliance by the appellant with the provisions of subdivision 1 of rule 16 of the Rules of Practice of this court (150 Fed. xxix, 79 C. C. A. xxix). For opinion below, see 210 Fed. 188.