General
Public Utilities Commission et al. v. Pollak et al.; and Pollak et al. v. Public Utilities Commission et al.
342 U.S. 848·Supreme Court of the United States·1951
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 224.
No. 295.
Public Utilities Commission et al. v. Pollak et al.; and Pollak et al. v. Public Utilities Commission et al.
Vernon E.West and Lloyd B. Harrison for the Public Utilities Commission; and Edmund L. Jones, F. Gloyd Await, Samuel O. Clark, Jr., Daryal A. Myse and W. V. T. Justis for the Capital Transit Co., petitioners in No. 224 and respondents in No. 295.
Paul M. Segal and Harry P. Warner for petitioners in No. 295 and respondents in No. 224; Franklin S. Poliak, pro se.
[MAJORITY]
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The motion for leave to file brief of Radio Cincinnati, Inc. et al., as amici curiae in No. 224, is denied. Certiorari granted.