Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Evelyn DUTIL, Administratrix of the Estate of Raymond Dutil, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Marlin M. MAYETTE, Defendant-Appellee, 1975 — 517 F.2d 936 · caselaw · US
General
Evelyn DUTIL, Administratrix of the Estate of Raymond Dutil, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Marlin M. MAYETTE, Defendant-Appellee
517 F.2d 936·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1975
Before KAUFMAN, Chief Judge, and SMITH and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Evelyn DUTIL, Administratrix of the Estate of Raymond Dutil, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Marlin M. MAYETTE, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 1089, Docket 75-7149.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued June 4, 1975.
Decided June 4, 1975.
Robert D. Rachlin, St. Johnsbury, Vt., for plaintiff-appellant.
John M. Dinse, Burlington, Vt., for defendant-appellee.
Before KAUFMAN, Chief Judge, and SMITH and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM:]
PER CURIAM:
We affirm for the reasons stated in Chief Judge Holden’s opinions below, D.C., 395 F.Supp. 922 and in Weinstein v. Medical Center, etc., of Vermont, Inc., 358 F.Supp. 297 (D.Vt.1972).