Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
GERMAIN v. MASON, 1872 — 154 U.S. 587 · caselaw · US
General
GERMAIN v. MASON
154 U.S. 58720 L. Ed. 689·Supreme Court of the United States·1872
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
GERMAIN v. MASON.
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE TERRITORY OE MONTANA.
No. 290.
Argued April 5, 1872.
Decided April 22, 1872.
"Writs of error from this court must bear the test of the Chief Justice.
Motion to dismiss. The ease is stated in the opinion.
Mr. A. M. Woodfolk, Mr. F. A. Dick and Mr. George G. Wright for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. J. Hubley Ashton and Mr. Nathaniel Wilson for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Chief Justice Chase]
Mr. Chief Justice Chase
delivered the opinion of the court.
The writ of error in this case, as in the case of Wells v. McGregor, 13 Wall. 188, decided at this term, bears the test of the clerk of the Supreme Court of the Territory of Montana and not the test of the Chief Justice of this court.
It must therefore be dismissed.