Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Susan F. Platt v. Annie R. Platt, Appellant, Nathan C. Platt et al., Respondents. (Three Actions.), 1888 — 110 N.Y. 648 · caselaw · US
General
Susan F. Platt v. Annie R. Platt, Appellant, Nathan C. Platt et al., Respondents. (Three Actions.)
110 N.Y. 648·New York Court of Appeals·1888·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Susan F. Platt v. Annie R. Platt, Appellant, Nathan C. Platt et al., Respondents. (Three Actions.)
(Argued June 19, 1888;
decided June 29, 1888.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, which affirmed an order directing as to the distribution of the sale in partition in each of three actions entitled as above.
William Allen Butler and William R. Martin for appellant.
William G. Wilson and Payson Merrill for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Order affirmed.