General
Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. et al. v. United States et al.
354 U.S. 917·Supreme Court of the United States·1957
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 927.
Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. et al. v. United States et al.
Nuel D. Belnap and Harold E. Spencer for the Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co., and C. F. Taplin, Jr. for the Ohio Coal Association, appellants. Solicitor General Rankin, Robert W. Ginnane and Samuel R. Howell for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, and Howard F. Burns, R. B. Clay tor, Hugh B. Cox, Anthony P. Donadío, John P. Fishwick, Richard J. Murphy, W. A. Wilkinson and Edward A. Kaier for the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. et al., appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.