General
The Jewelers' League of New York, Plaintiff, v. Conrad Hepke et al., Defendants. Conrad Hepke, Appellant; Thekla M. Becker, Respondent
166 N.Y. 605·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Jewelers’ League of New York, Plaintiff, v. Conrad Hepke et al., Defendants. Conrad Hepke, Appellant; Thekla M. Becker, Respondent
Jewelers’ League of N. Y. v. Hepke, 49 App. Div. 648, affirmed.
(Argued March 4, 1901;
decided March 19, 1901.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 7, 1900, affirming a judgment in an action of interpleader to determine the ownership of certain benefit moneys, entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Walter R. Beach for appellant.
Abel Crook for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Vann and Landon, JJ. Taking no part: Parker, Ch. J.